In my New York City neighborhood, brutalist architecture forms the residential foundation. Buildings planned and built in the 1970s were brutalist in design, a style favoring utility over embellishments. But despite the unfortunate name, brutalism on Roosevelt Island has shown that it can be the basis for enriching lifestyle choices. While that central foundation is surrounded by both historic and modernist styles, it is as steeped in originality as the community itself.
by David Stone
Brutalist architecture, despite its unpleasant name, broke out popular in the 1950s with lasting effects. Its use of rough-hewn materials like concrete and steel abandoned traditional notions of beauty for a more utilitarian approach. This gave brutalism its “brutal” nickname.
Despite its brutalist origins, the style has been praised in recent years for its honesty and functionality. Its raw materials give brutalist architecture a feeling of solidity and strength. And, because brutalism is often associated with social housing, it has a democratic quality to it as well.
While brutalism fell out of favor in the 1980s, it has seen a resurgence in popularity in recent years. Architects are beginning to appreciate brutalism for its brutal honesty and its simple, functional aesthetic.
What is brutalist architecture?
Brutalist architecture is a style of architecture that emerged in the mid-20th century and is characterized by its use of raw, unpolished concrete.
Brutalist buildings are typically functional and minimalist in design, with brutalist architects often prioritizing functionality over form. The name “brutalism” comes from the French word for “raw,” which accurately describes the unadorned aesthetic of these buildings.
Though brutalist architecture fell out of favor in the late 20th century, it is in the middle of a comeback, with many architects and designers appreciating its unique brutalist beauty.
The history of brutalist architecture.
Brutalist architecture emerged in the 1950s and was popularized in the 1960s and 1970s. It is characterized for its use of brutal, or brutalist, forms and materials. The style is often associated with urban decay and with the social and economic problems of the time.
However, some brutalist buildings have been praised for their boldness and for their ability to stand out in an otherwise bland landscape. The history of brutalist architecture is a history of conflicting emotions. Some people see it as an ugly style of building that should be demolished.
Others see it as a bold and original style that deserves to be preserved. Whatever your opinion, there is no denying that brutalist architecture is one of the most controversial styles of the 20th century.
How brutalist architecture has been received over the years.
Brutalist architecture has been a controversial style ever since it first emerged in the 1950s. Some people love the stark, brutal lines of brutalist buildings, while others find them ugly and Cold War-esque. However, there’s no denying that brutalist architecture is unique, and it has left its mark on the world of architecture.
Over the years, brutalism has undergone something of a renaissance, with many young architects rediscovering the style and finding new ways to interpret it.
This has led to some incredible brutalist buildings being built in recent years, and the style is now more popular than ever. Whether you love it or hate it, there’s no denying that brutalist architecture is here to stay.
Why brutalist architecture is enjoying a resurgence in popularity.
Brutalist architecture is enjoying a resurgence in popularity for a variety of reasons. First, brutalist buildings are often unique and eye-catching, making them ideal for Instagram posts and other forms of social media.
Secondly, brutalist architecture is often seen as being more honest and authentic than other styles, which can appeal to young people who are seeking out more authentic experiences.
Finally, brutalist buildings often have a strong sense of history and community, which can be appealing to people who are looking for a sense of connection to the past. Whether you love it or hate it, there’s no denying that brutalist architecture is having a moment.
Examples of brutalist architecture
Brutalist architecture is a style of architecture that emerged in the 1950s and gained popularity in the 1960s and 1970s. It is characterized by its use of raw, unfinished concrete and its brutal, utilitarian aesthetic. Brutalist buildings are often massive in scale and have a heavy, imposing presence. They are sometimes criticized for being cold and unforgiving, but they can also be seen as powerful and inspiring. Some famous examples of brutalist architecture include the Boston City Hall, the National Assembly Building in Dhaka (Designed by Louis Kahn of FDR Four Freedoms Park fame.), the Centenary Pavilion at the University of Leicester, and Trinity Square Garage in London.
While brutalist architecture is not always popular with the general public, it continues to be admired by many architects and scholars. On Roosevelt Island, its place in the core of community makes an income-integrated community possible. Even as buildings both historic and modern rise around it, it holds its ground. You couldn’t find a better place to live in New York’s single most community-friendly environment.
More from Assorted Ideas, Large & Small
- “How can he stay on?” a Reader Asks about RIOC CEO HaynesAfter reading about the latest in an avalanche of bad RIOC news, “How can he stay on?” he asked. Our reader asked about RIOC President/CEO Shelton J. Haynes, and his question echoed others bouncing around
- COVID Cases Soaring, Why Is RIOC PSD Still Snoring?COVID cases are soaring across New York City. The Health Department sounds alarms, pleading for face masks in all public places. But on Roosevelt Island, where positivity rates are 50% higher than the city average,
- RIOC Board Meeting, May 2022: A New Exercise in Bunker ModeBunker mode fits as well with New York’s Open Meetings Law as a whale on a shrimp boat. They’re antithetical. One reveals things; the other hides them. But controlled by an irresponsible governor and a
- Another One Bites the Dust: Markus Sztejnberg Exits RIOCMarkus Sztejnberg, the latest domino to fall in a row of RIOC executives, left recently after just a few months on staff. He “…is the latest RIOC executive to resign,” an informant tells The Daily.
- Losing Maloney, Maybe. Serrano for Sure. Final RedistrictingFinal redistricting by a Special Master appointed by a Steuben County judge guts the voting map approved by Democrats. The same judge threw them out as unconstitutional, and New York’s highest court agreed. Big change