Reading reports on television network viewership of the first night of the January 6th Committee hearings, I was reminded again. And again, I shook my head because Fox News’s impact is so minuscule relative to the reporting on it, it looks a lot like paranoia.

by David Stone

Assorted Ideas, Large & Small

Fox News, the Mouse that Snores

It’s simple. The report said that, despite being the only major network not carrying the hearing, Fox News got “its usual 3.1 million viewers.” Sounds like a lot, but it isn’t.

The total population of the U.S. is just over 330 million. So, 3.1 million viewers is less than 1% of us. That’s not even a rounding error in the national TV viewing audience.

And yes, that number includes children, but let’s say we cut them out. Generously, that gives Fox News something struggling to hit the big 2% mark.

According to AdWeek for the same period, ABC World News Tonight with David Muir averaged 7.72 million total viewers, NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt averaged 6.11 million total viewers and The CBS Evening News with Norah O’Donnell averaged 4.61 million total viewers.

That’s roughly 18 to 3 million, and that’s before counting other cable competitors like MSNBC and CNN.

So, What’s the Big Deal?

Is it media envy but out of all proportion? Or is it juvenile self-righteousness?

Why elevate big mouths griping to a small room – like Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingrahm and Sean Hannity – as if they’re lions scraping at the walls?

I think it’s for contrast. Making the Fox News, Trump-loving cadre out as the bad boys of media content has a prophylactic effect. That is, “We may be lackeys to corporate ownership and advertisers, but we’re not as bad as those guys.”

In a mainstream media marketplace that sells fear and foreboding, drawing viewers to advertisers with cures, the good guys may be the worst. Maybe the Fox News gang shouts louder just to be heard because that suits their advertisers.

After all, the My Pillow guy wants an audience too.

Support our independent journalism with a few bucks for expenses.

Thank you.

More from Assorted Ideas, Large & Small

• 
  New York Times Wins My First Annual Dimwit Health Reporting AwardSeptember 9, 2025
  The New York Times’ anti-alcohol article misrepresents health risks, failing to provide essential context and maintaining bias, while neglecting more pressing public health issues.
• 
  What Shapes American Conspiracy Theories?July 21, 2025
  In a recent New York Times article, the claim that television shows like the X Files created paranoid conspiracy theorists in America is challenged. David Stone argues that distrust in government stemmed from historical events, notably the 1963 assassination and subsequent cover-ups. He asserts that skepticism existed prior to such entertainment influences.
• 
  East or West Coast: Where to Have Your Beach WeddingMarch 19, 2025
  Plan your dream beach wedding! Discover top East and West Coast destinations, compare unique vibes, and explore expert tips to ensure the perfect day.
• 
  5 Tips for Driving Efficiency in Your Woodworking ShopMarch 18, 2025
  Woodworkers must stay productive while maintaining their focus on the job. Learn five essential tips for driving efficiency in your woodworking shop.
• 
  Tips for Preventing Accidents in Your Manufacturing PlantMarch 11, 2025
  A proactive approach can lower the number of incidents in your manufacturing facility. Learn several tips for preventing accidents in your manufacturing plant.

Who Chose Them? The Transparency Gap

Not who received the Public Purpose Fund money. Who decided where it went, how they were selected, and what residents were never told.

Theo Gobblevelt Jun 5, 2026

Last year, we focused on the outcomes.

Continue reading →