A NYS Senate supermajority raises a host of fresh possibilities, but few are profound than those for Roosevelt Island.
By David Stone
For state senator José Serrano, there’s been big change in the last three election cycles. In 2016, he was in the minority, but gains in 2018 put him in the majority.
And now that the NYS Senate has a Democratic supermajority, he has more clout, in theory, than ever before.
Roosevelt Island‘s other elected state official is Rebecca Seawright, and she’s enjoyed majority status in the state Assembly since her first day in Albany. But although she’s in a solid Democratic district, that has not brought much benefit locally.
Governor Cuomo’s role here, running RIOC, mostly confirms his undemocratic tendencies. He’s wiped out hard-won gains in local representation, and his operatives control what goes on with barely a nod at resident consensus.
What the NYS Senate Supermajority Means…
The significant thing about the new supermajority is how it shifts power away from a conservative governor in favor of progressives. A 42 to 20 Democrat balance gives the Senate enough weight to override Cuomo on any veto and exercise real authority.
While statewide, reports on the switch focus on taxes, housing and marijuana laws, possibilities for Roosevelt Island are more basic.
From Day One, Roosevelt Island was denied direct representation in local government. When the NYS Urban Development Corp. turned authority over to RIOC, it handed over Albany controls.
During the 1970s budget crisis, the state had bailed the city out by investing in Roosevelt Island. But UDC didn’t just agree on developing, it demanded political control too.
Roosevelt Island still votes for mayor and city council, but their offices exercise little influence. Mayor Bill de Blasio continues a tradition of barely knowing the Island’s still in the East River.
So, Seawright and Serrano are key players, and the Senate supermajority gives them new power. But will they exercise it to help Roosevelt Island?
Community activists have long focused on a pair of key needs for making RIOC more democratic and responsive.
First up, they’ve fought for an elected board of directors, but the state’s treated the demand like it’s farfetched.
With rare exceptions, citizens all across the U.S. vote for government representatives, but not here.
While the state controls two legally mandatory spots on RIOC’s board, seven more are appointed by the governor. Of those seven, two are ‘suggested” by the mayor.
A decade ago, local activists successfully pushed laws giving residents a majority of seats on the board, but that was pre-Cuomo. In his tenure, the governor learned how to subvert even that, never nominating a full board and appointing only certain “Yes” votes.
As research shows, the only thing easier than getting a unanimous “Yes” vote from RIOC’s board is falling off a log.
A second issue is residency.
No RIOC executive has ever lived on Roosevelt Island. And it’s furthered the sense of disconnection between state and community.
Activists have demanded that, at least, RIOC’s president live in the community he or she governs, and that’s also far from radical.
But it ought to go farther. Why shouldn’t the state agency resource local workers as readily as it gobbles up local income?
How the NYS Senate Supermajority Can Help
A little history…
Two election cycles before the Senate supermajority, Seawright and Serrano teamed up, introducing legislation calling for a residency requirement for RIOC’s president.
At the time, president/CEO Susan Rosenthal told The Roosevelt Island Daily that she would not accept the job with that condition attached.
But times changed, and so did our elected officials.
In 2016, when Republicans controlled the NYS Senate, the law Serrano and Seawright offered stood no chance of passing, and they knew that.
Sadly, their action proved only symbolic because in 2018, when Democrats took over the Senate, making passage possible, they didn’t renew the bid.
Because that looked so cynical, I asked Seawright about it. Her media liaison said she’d touch base with Serrano and get back to me. While she might’ve done the former, she never did the later.
But now, with Cuomo’s authority lessened, things have changed again.
If our electeds genuinely want to support us, they have the power to revolutionize RIOC, forcing the agency to become responsive.
It’s a big load, and many other things need attention in Albany. But for Roosevelt Island, fixing RIOC couldn’t be more important.
More from the Roosevelt Island Daily
- What Went Wrong? Bungling Public Purpose Grants AgainUnderstanding what went wrong – again – with distributing public purpose funds starts with a single point. It’s an aggravating factor that’s existed for years. RIOC knows it but won’t fix it. While showing extraordinary generosity to its executives, the state agency under Governor Kathy Hochul is an unsparing cheapskate when it comes to the
- Spring is here, and the Southpoint Rock Farm is… RockyThe Shelton J. Haynes/Langan Southpoint Rock Farm promised pathways with “lush vegetation.” Promise fulfilled? You decide. by David Stone The Roosevelt Island Daily News The Southpoint Rock Farm Today The secret deal cut between the Roosevelt Island Operating Corporation (RIOC) and bestie Langan yielded significant seawall safety improvements. And torturous esthetic sins. A rock garden
- RIOC Reform: What the New Law Does – If Hochul Signs ItRIOC reform, sought by residents for many years, is on the cusp. All it takes is a signature by Governor Kathy Hochul to make a bill championed by Assembly Member Rebecca Seawright and Senator José Serrano a reality. Here’s what it covers – and still lacks. by David Stone The Roosevelt Island Daily News RIOC
- The Art of Paul Gauguin: A Painter’s Restless LifePaul Gauguin was a French Post-Impressionist artist who was born on the 7th of June in 1848 and died at the age of 54 on the 8th of May in 1903. by David Stone for Assorted Ideas, Large & Small Paul Gauguin on His Way By the end of his life, Gauguin was known for
- How the hippie counterculture movement changed AmericaThe hippie counterculture movement of the 1960s was a response to the conservatism and materialism of the 1950s. The hippies sought to create a new society based on peace, love, and brotherhood. They believed that people could change the world if they worked together. by David Stone for Assorted Ideas, Large & Small While the