At RIOC’s Swift COVID testing site, are consumers being gouged on prices and more?

At RIOC’s Swift COVID testing site, are consumers being gouged on prices and more?

Are consumers being gouged on prices at RIOC’s Swift COVID testing site? According to information gleaned from a Kaiser Health Network report, they may be. And as Roosevelt Islanders foot the bills, profiteering appears to reach far beyond that. Here’s what we know, so far.

By David Stone

Roosevelt Island Daily News

Lab companies have been booking record profits by charging $100 per test.

Kaiser Health News

KHN’s report refers to a “molecular covid test that costs $50 or less to run.”

But RIOC’s site charges four times that much, $200 per test, and may be adding other charges. It’s transparent to those being tested because it’s passed on to insurers.

Castlight Health analyzed the costs of 1.1 million tests billed to insurers during the year ending in February. “The analysis found an average charge of $90.”

“Billing by hospitals and clinics from outside insurance company networks can be especially lucrative because the government requires insurers to pay their posted covid-test price with no limit,” KHN reported.

But RIOC’s Swift COVID rapid testing site may fall under a different set of guidelines. “Regulation for out-of-network vaccine charges, by contrast, is stricter. Charges for vaccines must be ‘reasonable,’ according to federal regulations, with relatively low Medicare prices as a possible guideline.”

The Medicare reimbursement rate, the standard for reasonable, is $100 per molecular test.

But RIOC and Swift may still be legal in charging double that, if not ethical.

The super secret state agency has not disclosed details of any possible profit-sharing with Swift, although they’ve repeatedly promoted the site and the $200 fee.

If consumer are being gouged on Main Street, it’s only part of the story because, as reported earlier, Roosevelt Islanders funded suspicious cost since the site’s start up.

Roosevelt Island consumers being gouged from Day One?

In a peculiar presentation at RIOC’s April meeting, staffer Mary Cunneen asked for board approval of $319,750, compensating Swift Medical for managing the testing site. But although the board of enablers acted as if nothing was amiss, an apparent gap in purchasing was obvious.

RIOC spent that $319K apparently without required board approval, and no record exists of its legally mandated posting the State Contract Reporter. The Contract Reporter started in the 1990s as a tool for assuring bidding is public and fair.

What the board settled for is troubling. With a document in front of them claiming 3 competitive bids, the board didn’t blink when Cunneen raced past rejecting six Department of Health approved providers, going instead with Swift. Swift had no previous experience in running a testing center, and Cunneen offered no rationale for the decision.

Nor did she say who approved the expense.

A year ago, RIOC staff presented charts of bidding results, accompanied by justifications, when asking for award approval. But in the Shelton J. Haynes era, it’s different.

And it might be true that someone briefed the board privately in advance of the meeting, thereby skirting public disclosure.

But aren’t there protections against consumers being gouged?

brown steel locker cabinet with padlock
A bank of firewalls in a computer center./Photo by Arif Kemal Köroğlu on Pexels.com
person holding plate with noodle dish and chopstick
Soba Noodles/Photo by Polina Tankilevitch on Pexels.com

Firewalls and Soba Noodles

As a kind of firewall, RIOC’s board is responsible for ensuring the state agency’s lawful operations. But as we saw in the Susan Rosenthal fiasco, they rarely do anything of the kind.

Consider the illustration above. RIOC’s board more closely resembles a bowl of soba noodles than the bulwark of proper firewalls.

Rosenthal sued each member individually for their miserable group failure at getting a spine during her firing. That case is pending in New York State Supreme Court.

Conclusion: Are Roosevelt Islanders and consumers being gouged and not just on prices?

With so much undisclosed by hermetic RIOC, answers are scarce, but the graver concern is nobody asking questions. The board, the fundamental layer of protection against misconduct, might as well continue its nearly year long vacation from reality.

Elected officials? State Senator José Serrano hides out in the Bronx, and Assembly Member Rebecca Seawright evolved from a promising start to high volume Cuomo/RIOC enabler. Neither challenges RIOC, Governor Cuomo’s local baby, and of course, the governor himself is awash is greater scandals.

In the next few days, The Daily plans on requesting complete details on how RIOC handled contracting with Swift, via a Freedom of Information request. Sunlight’s a good thing when it breaks the cloud cover protecting RIOC.

There is no clear evidence of any wrongdoing, but there’s enough smoke provoking a thorough search for anything burning inside the bunker.

The state agency, following Cuomo’s lead, however, has been glacially slow at answering FOIL requests and almost always leaves out significant details.

We’ll see what we get and when and keep our readers updated.

Latest from the Roosevelt Island Daily

  • What is the difference between consciousness and awareness?
    The consensus belief is that “consciousness is the sum of all our perceptions, and awareness is the sum of all our conscious experiences.” Let’s take a closer look. by David Stone In other words, consciousness refers to our ability to perceive and process information, while awareness refers to our conscious experience of the world around
  • Crazy Suzanne – Poetry
    Summer day, late afternoon, Crazy Suzanne appears at my door. “Are my tits getting bigger?” she wonders, raising her shirt up to her shoulders. Never having made their acquaintance before, I was at a loss but I looked anyway. Another time, another season, another person, I’d have invited her inside for further discussions, but this
  • RIOC, Haynes Slammed with New Discrimination Lawsuit
    Last month, precisely one year after being fired, former RIOC in-house counsel Arthur Eliav filed a discrimination lawsuit against his former employer. Also named as defendants are President/CEO Shelton J. Haynes, Chief Counsel Gretchen Robinson and Assistant Vice President Tajuna Sharpe. All are African-American, according to the lawsuit. Eliav is a Caucasian, observant Orthodox Jew.
  • What is the best time of year to visit New York City?
    There are a lot of great things about New York City, but one of the best things is that there’s always something to do. No matter what time of year you visit, there’s always a festival or event going on. But if you’re looking for the best time to visit New York City, we recommend
  • New York Assembly Districting Now Sucks Roosevelt Island Into Queens
    Just when you thought you were safely set in Manhattan, New York State Assembly Districting chucks Roosevelt Island into Queens once more. We survived City Council and State Senate battles, but here we go again. by David Stone The Roosevelt Island Daily News When Roosevelt Islanders fought to keep Roosevelt Island from sliding east into

Written by:

2,671 Posts

View All Posts
Follow Me :

One thought on “At RIOC’s Swift COVID testing site, are consumers being gouged on prices and more?

Leave a Reply

You May Have Missed

Wordpress Social Share Plugin powered by Ultimatelysocial
0
2k
%d bloggers like this: